 The Paragon Wiki Archive documents the state of City of Heroes/Villains as it existed on December 1, 2012.
|
Talk:Weekly Strike Target
From Paragon Wiki Archive
Revision as of 20:53, 28 March 2011 by Draeth Darkstar (Talk | contribs) (Now with improved thinkifying.)
Abbreviation
Requesting a new abbreviation for Weekly Task Force... honestly I don;t wanna be getting tells like this:
[Tell]averagejoehero:WTF?
Maybe Task Force of the Week (TFW) would be better as a global recommendation for abbreviation. just a thought.Joshex 19:25, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
- Technically, WST is the proper official abbreviation based on the term that was handed to us by the developers. The alternate abbreviations are in frequent use throughout the community, meaning that only the community-at-large really has the power to change that. --Eabrace
19:36, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Past Strike Targets?
At what point do we start removing "Past Strike Targets"? The list is going to get long pretty quickly if we add another line every week. SpaceNut 16:49, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Personally, I think it should be removed immediately. I don't see it holding much historical significance. --GuyPerfect 16:59, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- The only use I really see the list serving is in the case where someone is asking, "When can I expect my favorite TF to be the WST?" and the answer is, "It already was the WST <X> weeks ago." Perhaps if we want to preserve those dates, it would be better to indicate in an already existing table the last time a given TF was the WST. (Maybe here or in a "Historical" section in the individual TF's main article, for example.) --Eabrace 17:33, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- The only use I really see the list serving is in the case where someone is asking, "When can I expect my favorite TF to be the WST?" and the answer is, "It already was the WST <X> weeks ago." Perhaps if we want to preserve those dates, it would be better to indicate in an already existing table the last time a given TF was the WST. (Maybe here or in a "Historical" section in the individual TF's main article, for example.) --Eabrace
| Badge Awarded |
Task Force Name | Contact | Min Size |
Level Range | Merits | Missions | WST Date | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
The Rule of Three | Positron | 3 | 10 to 15 | 11 | 7 | N/A | Accolade requirement for Positron's Ally and Task Force Commander. |
|
Dam Hero | Positron | 3 | 11 to 16 | 15 | 7 | N/A | Accolade requirement for Positron's Ally and Task Force Commander. |
|
The Fall of the Clockwork King | Synapse | 4 | 15 to 20 | 58 | 15 | N/A | Accolade requirement for Task Force Commander. |
|
Clamor and Destruction | Sister Psyche | 5 | 20 to 25 | 50 | 14 | 02/22/11- 02/28/11 |
Accolade requirement for Task Force Commander. |
What do people think? Does it make the table too crowded? SpaceNut 21:46, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- I personally feel that a Historical section in this article with the some of the above information in the table would be the most logical choice. A mention should be made in the Task Force article that Weekly Strike history can be found here. That said, I'm not sure it would be necessary to display any information other than the Task Force name, the last Weekly Strike Target date, and possibly the badge icon just for visual clarity. An alternate possibility would be to display the abridged version of the table I described here and additionally add the Weekly Strike Target column on the Task Force page. Draeth Darkstar 20:48, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
