User talk:Aggelakis

Archives

Page 1

Talk Page Edits

Go below this line! ~ AGGE talk/cons 00:34, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Not afraid to edit

I just didn't have all the correct info Mattwo 05:13, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Delete my images

Could you delete all of my images here [1] , save for the one currently linked to my user page? Knight Jolt 20:58, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Taken care of.  :) --Eabrace 22:45, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. ;) Knight Jolt 23:37, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Empowerment Station Buff Recipes and Ingredients

I moved it to a subpage of your user page, User:Aggelakis/Empowerment Station Buff Recipes and Ingredients, since you are the only user on it and since it has sat dormant for over a year now. In its unfinished form, it wasn't contributing anything since it duplicates the existing content and wasn't yet presentable for printing. Since nobody has bothered to take up the torch to finish in a year, I wonder whether there's actually a need for it. We don't often provide printable and non-printable versions of the same content, since that requires making updates in two locations. It might be better to try to incorporate some of your design elements into the design of the main page. I personally think the main page's look is a bit too busy and spaced-out, and like some elements of your design better. In fact, since individual pages (such as Confusion_Resistance_(Empowerment)) show the icons, I don't even see a need to include the salvage icons in the table; maybe it'd be better to mostly replace the existing tables with a design similar to yours, since it's primarily for quick-reference anyway. -- Sekoia 17:03, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Links

Duh, great. Since now a lot of terms can refer to different factions or even to different concepts, now one has to be extra careful with the links... And I already hated the Praetorian Police Department/PPD link for the disambiguation issues...

I'll be more careful from now on about the links. I hadn't noticed they were wrong. Sorry for the extra work, Agge.

--Yakovlev 09:16, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

AWB

Your recent recipe changes look kinda like something that might have been bot-driven. Did you get AWB working? Just curious. :) -- Sekoia 05:18, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Yes! Thank you. It was the /w/ part that I couldn't figure out the correct URL for. :) ~ AGGE talk/cons 05:24, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Awesome! Glad to hear it. :D -- Sekoia 05:34, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

IncarnateComponent_Drop DPL

Found the problem with getting the Favor of the Well rarity to display correctly in the Incarnate Component list. Don't you just hate when that happens?  :) --Eabrace 11:59, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Re: Incarnate Components

Sorry! I went looking, and couldn't find it. So, I decided to follow the other Salvage... template's format.  FW (talk · contrib)  05:41, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Also, it looks like the images for the various incarnate components are not named in a uniform way, which is throwing off IComponentImage. Some are named "incarnate component name", while others are named "IncarnateComponentName".  FW (talk · contrib)  05:45, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Stub/WiP

Did not realize it was one or the other. I will make note of that in the future. Felderburg 20:07, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Stats / Darkness Power

• First off, thanks for going through my backtrail and fixing/sprucing things up for me! I appreciate that you apparently embraced the change, and it was a huge learning opportunity for me to mess around with a template like that one!
• Secondly, I was under the impression that Darkness Control was specifically mentioned as "free to VIPs" and from that I assumed Dark Affinity would be free to everyone since it is a port of an existing free powerset... no idea why I added Affinity to the PMarket Template... brain fart, I guess?

—Thirty7 18:24, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

I'm clawing through the thousands of posts from the Pummit to find the commentary on Darkness Control. It might be a bit. (Soo... maany... poosts...!) ~ AGGE talk/cons 18:32, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

I'da done that myself, but I have no forum access from my internship :'(. —Thirty7 18:36, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Faultline (pre-Issue 8)

I am a bit unclear why the redirect page (to which nothing links) can't be deleted after it has been moved to a page with proper capitalization (Faultline (Pre-Issue 8)). I don't have a vested interest, per se, but was just curious to make sure I understand for the future. —Thirty7 14:25, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

As I said in the edit comment, "when people consistently link to it, yes there is". ~ AGGE talk/cons 03:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Well, the only reason I posted that was to clarify your edit comment... which I didn't really understand. Are you saying numerous people type in the exact capitalization used in the old format? Because even if they did, they would get to the new page without the redirect... —Thirty7 05:30, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

As an aside, nothing links to it because I changed the links. :p ~ AGGE talk/cons 03:27, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

I suspected that you might have... because I realized that I hadn't much later. :( —Thirty7 05:30, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

I have to say I'm also unclear as to why we need to keep the redirect. People were consistently linking to the old title because that's where the old page lived. They'll now consistently link to the new title because that's where it now lives. Updating the old links is part of the process for renaming a page, it's not a factor that holds any weight for keeping the redirect around once it's done. -- Sekoia 07:21, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Power Set

May I ask why you took it upon yourself to slaughter those poor, defenseless instances of "Power Set" and replaced them with "powerset" in the I22 articles? The official, proper-case term is Power Set. --GuyPerfect 19:35, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

I replaced "Power Set" with "power set", as that is the standard across the rest of the power set pages. I missed a space in one and copy-pasted it into the rest of them. It would have taken you ten freaking seconds to fix the three missing spaces. Congratulations on saving those ten seconds to spend a minute making a comment on my talk page instead. ~ AGGE talk/cons 03:20, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Actually, thanks for bringing it up. We'll have to correct all lowercase instances of "power set", since it does indeed seem to be like that all over the wiki. --GuyPerfect 17:46, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm going to have to disagree. If you want to put up a forum post for consensus, go for it, but I have always treated terms like that as an extension of the rule from here that says effects shouldn't be capitalized, and it looks like everyone else except you has done the same. ~ AGGE talk/cons 03:33, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Does that mean pages like Dark Blast (Powerset) need to be "renamed" to Dark Blast (Power Set)? —Thirty7 15:30, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

The devs, website, and help use "Power Set", "power set", "Powerset", and "powerset" fairly interchangeably. I recommend against making any widespread changes until either we're provided with an official stance on how it should be spelled or until we have consensus to pick one as wiki-official. -- Sekoia 19:38, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

I think, at the very least, it should be incontrovertibly decided as being two separate words, the same as "costume set." Capitalization is probably going to be situational, such as in a title versus in body text. The current version of the character creator uses the phrases "Primary Power Set" and "Secondary Power Set" several times, even in body text, but I can see us differentiating between uses as the "Dark Blast (Power Set)" article and "the Dark Blast power set" in a sentence. -- Blondeshell 23:19, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

I would like to revisit this idea here... and put up a vote on the talk page for Power Set. —  Talk · Cont 13:11, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Userbox of Newness

Thought maybe you'd be interested in this, {{Userbox Subpages}}... considering I stole the idea for it from your userpage! —  Talk · Cont 13:08, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Recent Edit to Weapon Customization

Hmmm, I guess I didn't notice that convention and was simply making it align to the name of the actual Power Set without thought to the number of them in use. —  Talk · Cont 08:15, 6 June 2012 (UTC)