Talk:Issue 15

this might be the article that was referred to: [1] Robbertjan

• Added that to the article. Thanks for finding it! SaintNicster 16:39, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

"Fifth Anniversary" comment

My word-smithing isn't that great, so if someone wants to tweak the line, feel free. Also something to note was GhostRaptor's comment from the UK boards saying no "release date or even a release window" SaintNicster 16:43, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

"August 2008 Interview with Positron" comment

I think that August interview with Positron should likely get moved to Issue 16's page. The interview was done before they had to split up Issue 13 into two issues and thus would move the comments down an issue. Which of course would mesh well with what Positron says in the interview of tying up loose ends given it deals with the Praetorians. --Savitar 19:09, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

In Beta

Refrech my memory please, on the policy for content that's still in beta. Is it open season on pages for the new TF and SF, for example? SpaceNut 18:19, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Closed Beta stuff needs to be left off the main wiki. But there is not closed beta for I15, just open Beta, beginning sometime today. Open Beta stuff is all fair game for the wiki, as long as the pages are tagged as being from the coming issue. Don't worry too much about it, though. You're not the only one who will be posting info on the new TF/SFs rapidly. And if you do not properly tag it for I15, someone else certainly will soon after. So, in short, have at it. - Sister Leortha 20:20, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Can we reach consensus on the short names for the TF and SF? Contacts are Barracuda and Dr. Khan. I propose "Barracuda Strike Force" and Dr. Khan Task Force" (BSF and DKTF) as opposed to something like Sth Column TF and 5th Column SF. Thoughts? SpaceNut 22:14, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

"Barracuda Strike Force" and "Dr. Khan Task Force" would match the currently established method for naming Task/Strike forces. --Eabrace 22:32, 27 May 2009 (UTC)