 The Paragon Wiki Archive documents the state of City of Heroes/Villains as it existed on December 1, 2012.
|
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Day Job Badges"
From Paragon Wiki Archive
m (→Issue 18 Updates: notes no longer needed) |
(silencing link to {{Badgenav}}) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== TOCright == | == TOCright == | ||
| − | ''removed {{tl|TOCright}} -- does not play well with {{ | + | ''removed {{tl|TOCright}} -- does not play well with <nowiki>{{Badgenav}}</nowiki>'' - Sekoia |
:{{tl|TOCright}} exists on every badge tab page, and I see no issues with it on this or any other badge tab page. O.o? -- [[User:Aggelakis|Agge]] <sub>([[User_talk:Aggelakis|talk]])</sub> 02:42, 4 July 2009 (UTC) | :{{tl|TOCright}} exists on every badge tab page, and I see no issues with it on this or any other badge tab page. O.o? -- [[User:Aggelakis|Agge]] <sub>([[User_talk:Aggelakis|talk]])</sub> 02:42, 4 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
:: I took a screenshot of how it was rendering for me: [[:File:Screenshot-Day-Job-Badges-Article.png]] (linking instead of inlining since it's big). We had two right-floats, and the badge one was to the left of the TOC. And between the two of them, they took up over half the width. I thought it looked really bad. In all honesty, I don't really like how the Badgenav is implemented -- navboxes should go at the bottom of the article, they shouldn't be right-floats at the top. But I wasn't really interested in messing with that, so I figured removing the TOCright would be a non-controversial improvement. *shrugs* It's not a huge deal to me if it gets reverted back in. :) -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 02:56, 4 July 2009 (UTC) | :: I took a screenshot of how it was rendering for me: [[:File:Screenshot-Day-Job-Badges-Article.png]] (linking instead of inlining since it's big). We had two right-floats, and the badge one was to the left of the TOC. And between the two of them, they took up over half the width. I thought it looked really bad. In all honesty, I don't really like how the Badgenav is implemented -- navboxes should go at the bottom of the article, they shouldn't be right-floats at the top. But I wasn't really interested in messing with that, so I figured removing the TOCright would be a non-controversial improvement. *shrugs* It's not a huge deal to me if it gets reverted back in. :) -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 02:56, 4 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:46, 2 October 2010
 Archives |
| Page 1 · Page 2 |
Issue 14 Multi-Credit
Issue 14 seems to have tweaked many day job locations. For instance, the Base Portal in Talos Island was moved, and can no longer be used for dual credit on Template:DayJobBadge and Template:DayJobBadge. I have seen mentions on the Official Forums about RWZ multi-credit locations being tweaked. I am removing everything from the front page until we can verify stuff. See Page 2 of the archives for the old listings. -- Agge (talk) 19:31, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
All the Mercy Island day job locations near Kalinda will only give credit for 1 day job at a time. -- Snow Globe 05:18, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- I logged out in most of the previous dual-locations with different characters and only got one badge credit at a time at each location. Removed Section. -- Agge (talk) 18:09, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
TOCright
removed {{TOCright}} -- does not play well with {{Badgenav}} - Sekoia
- {{TOCright}} exists on every badge tab page, and I see no issues with it on this or any other badge tab page. O.o? -- Agge (talk) 02:42, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- I took a screenshot of how it was rendering for me: File:Screenshot-Day-Job-Badges-Article.png (linking instead of inlining since it's big). We had two right-floats, and the badge one was to the left of the TOC. And between the two of them, they took up over half the width. I thought it looked really bad. In all honesty, I don't really like how the Badgenav is implemented -- navboxes should go at the bottom of the article, they shouldn't be right-floats at the top. But I wasn't really interested in messing with that, so I figured removing the TOCright would be a non-controversial improvement. *shrugs* It's not a huge deal to me if it gets reverted back in. :) -- Sekoia 02:56, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
