Difference between revisions of "Talk:Issue 24"
From Paragon Wiki Archive
m |
(+reply) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
So, with CoX ending, is issue 24 actually going to go live? - [[User:Fescu|Fescu]] 02:09, 1 September 2012 (UTC) | So, with CoX ending, is issue 24 actually going to go live? - [[User:Fescu|Fescu]] 02:09, 1 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
:Unfortunately, I think it's unlikely that it will. ''Rumor'' (and I stress that word) is that the staff layoffs were immediate and there isn't even anyone manning the servers right now. If that's the case, should a server crash, it might not come back up. --[[User:Eabrace|Eabrace]] [[File:Healthbar notify phone.png|20px|link=User talk:Eabrace]] 02:55, 1 September 2012 (UTC) | :Unfortunately, I think it's unlikely that it will. ''Rumor'' (and I stress that word) is that the staff layoffs were immediate and there isn't even anyone manning the servers right now. If that's the case, should a server crash, it might not come back up. --[[User:Eabrace|Eabrace]] [[File:Healthbar notify phone.png|20px|link=User talk:Eabrace]] 02:55, 1 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::Based on how Posi was talking on the forums, it may even be questionable if the Devs have forum access via their rednames! All development for the game is done. As such, there will be no further content releases, period. It's sad. {{User:Thirty7/Sig}} 04:04, 1 September 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:04, 1 September 2012
So, with CoX ending, is issue 24 actually going to go live? - Fescu 02:09, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I think it's unlikely that it will. Rumor (and I stress that word) is that the staff layoffs were immediate and there isn't even anyone manning the servers right now. If that's the case, should a server crash, it might not come back up. --Eabrace 02:55, 1 September 2012 (UTC)