Difference between revisions of "Talk:Incarnate Thread Component"

Revision as of 09:05, 27 January 2012

Missing Section

The "Used In" section is missing recipes for Commons (20 threads each, yes?). It appears to be a problem with the templates, but I don't like to fiddle with templates, so I'm leaving it alone and hoping someone will read this and fix it.Haecceity 18:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Turns out those particular templates required a lot of fiddling... but it's fixed now! -- Sekoia 09:44, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

How to Get

Is there anyway that we can make the various "How to Get" sections look cleaner? Something like this, maybe:

Threads	From Item:
5	10 Incarnate Shards
10	10 Incarnate Shards and 1,000,000 inf (usable only once every 20 hours)
4	1 Astral Merit
20	1 Empyrean Merit
40	1 Notice of the Well
100	1 Favor of the Well

—Thirty7 14:18, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Oh, I think we could probably put something together pretty easily to do that. I'm thinking along the lines of the tables in the articles for each power set. Maybe something like:

{{ThreadGet_Start}}

{{ThreadGet_Row|threads=5|component={{IComponent|Incarnate Shard|10}}}}

{{ThreadGet_Row|threads=10|component={{IComponent|Incarnate Shard|10}} and 1,000,000 [[inf]]<br />(usable only once every 20 hours)}}

{{ThreadGet_Row|threads=4|component={{IComponent|Astral Merit|1}}}}

{{ThreadGet_Row|threads=20|component={{IComponent|Empyrean Merit|1}}}}

{{ThreadGet_Row|threads=40|component={{IComponent|Notice of the Well|1}}}}

{{ThreadGet_Row|threads=100|component={{IComponent|Favor of the Well|1}}}}

{{ThreadGet_End}}

Alternately, we could define the template to just accept the arguments without identifiers if that's not potentially too confusing:

{{ThreadGet_Start}}

{{ThreadGet_Row|5|{{IComponent|Incarnate Shard|10}}}}

{{ThreadGet_Row|10|{{IComponent|Incarnate Shard|10}} and 1,000,000 [[inf]]<br />(usable only once every 20 hours)}}

{{ThreadGet_Row|4|{{IComponent|Astral Merit|1}}}}

{{ThreadGet_Row|20|{{IComponent|Empyrean Merit|1}}}}

{{ThreadGet_Row|40|{{IComponent|Notice of the Well|1}}}}

{{ThreadGet_Row|100|{{IComponent|Favor of the Well|1}}}}

{{ThreadGet_End}}

And the names of the templates are, of course, subject to change if anyone has any better suggestions. :)

Note that I intentionally did not assume that we would want the IComponent template calls to be assumed due to the info in that second row. --Eabrace 15:59, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

After some further thought, we could name the templates IComponentGet_ instead of ThreadGet_ and add a parameter to the _Start to specify what you're converting to (e.g. Threads, Arcane Cantrips, Favor of the Well) if we want something that could be used for more than just threads.

{{IComponentGet_Start|Threads}}

{{IComponentGet_Row|5|{{IComponent|Incarnate Shard|10}}}}

{{IComponentGet_Row|10|{{IComponent|Incarnate Shard|10}} and 1,000,000 [[inf]]<br />(usable only once every 20 hours)}}

{{IComponentGet_Row|4|{{IComponent|Astral Merit|1}}}}

{{IComponentGet_Row|20|{{IComponent|Empyrean Merit|1}}}}

{{IComponentGet_Row|40|{{IComponent|Notice of the Well|1}}}}

{{IComponentGet_Row|100|{{IComponent|Favor of the Well|1}}}}

{{IComponentGet_End}}

--Eabrace 16:36, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

If we are gonna make a template to do this, then I think that last option is the way to go... adaptability and multitasking Templates are a good thing. Also makes it easier to promote consistency among articles. : Approved! —Thirty7 21:50, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Also, I have been meaning to ask this... when we are creating templates that make tables, why is it that we define a template to end the table when "|}" could work just as well... and be shorter? —Thirty7 21:53, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

>.> you want to template it.. we have 2 merits that can be converted into threads right now, with 2 more on the way.. --Sleepykitty 00:17, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Has it been confirmed that those Merits are actually gonna be used? —Thirty7 01:24, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

<.< will be used? yes, break down into anything in the current incarnate bits... err... >.> --Sleepykitty 02:05, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

I can think of two possible reasons behind using a template to end a table. The first is that it might be clearer to someone unfamiliar with wiki syntax; nothing else in the series of template calls uses table syntax, and then suddenly there's this weird "|}" at the end... "what is that for?". As opposed to something like "{{IComponentGet_End}} which semantically states what it's doing instead of using a cryptic symbol. The second reason is that if we ever change the implementation of the set of templates, "|}" may no longer be a suitable closing for it. Perhaps we'll decide someday to do it with divs. Or perhaps we'll decide to add a table footer to all of the tables. Using a template allows us to more easily make such changes should we decide to later. That all said... I don't find either reasoning all that compelling most of the time and we're far from consistent on the matter. -- Sekoia 09:05, 27 January 2012 (UTC)