Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hamidon Origin Enhancements"
Baalus Seth (Talk | contribs) (→Enzyme %'s: new section) |
(→Centriole Exposure: new section) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Are they correct? The other def/tohit debuff says 33%-[[User:Baalus Seth|Skarmory The PG]] 17:36, 8 April 2008 (UTC) | Are they correct? The other def/tohit debuff says 33%-[[User:Baalus Seth|Skarmory The PG]] 17:36, 8 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Centriole Exposure == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Dam (33%) /Range (20%) | ||
+ | Knowing how dam and dam resist work together, has anyone sucessfully slotted these into the single target sonic bubbles (which take range)? | ||
+ | Two (66.6% ED scales to 56.9%) would put you well over the soft cap, compared to 2 level 50 IO (ED 49.7%)[[User:Catwhoorg|Catwhoorg]] 21:10, 6 January 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 21:10, 6 January 2009
ToHit/Defense bugs
I have not checked, has the ToHit/Defense buff/debuff slotting into powers that do the opposite still enhance the opposite property properly? In other words, can I slot an Enzyme (ToHit/Defense Debuff + End )into Tactics (which does ToHit Buff) and still get the ToHit Buff? I could have sworn seeing a patch note or redname post that this was fixed. --Konoko 23:57, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
Enzyme %'s
Are they correct? The other def/tohit debuff says 33%-Skarmory The PG 17:36, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Centriole Exposure
Dam (33%) /Range (20%) Knowing how dam and dam resist work together, has anyone sucessfully slotted these into the single target sonic bubbles (which take range)? Two (66.6% ED scales to 56.9%) would put you well over the soft cap, compared to 2 level 50 IO (ED 49.7%)Catwhoorg 21:10, 6 January 2009 (UTC)