Difference between revisions of "Talk:Overwhelming Force"
From Paragon Wiki Archive
GuyPerfect (Talk | contribs) |
(broken? lack of InvSetOverview use) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Are there really 7 enhancements in this set? And do all of the last four set bonuses kick in at 5, rather than 6, enhancements slotted? -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 02:57, 28 June 2012 (UTC) | Are there really 7 enhancements in this set? And do all of the last four set bonuses kick in at 5, rather than 6, enhancements slotted? -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 02:57, 28 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
:Heh. My bad. (-: --[[User:GuyPerfect|GuyPerfect]] 04:08, 28 June 2012 (UTC) | :Heh. My bad. (-: --[[User:GuyPerfect|GuyPerfect]] 04:08, 28 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | This set seems to have broken {{tl|IO Category List}}, probably since it doesn't use {{tl|InvSetOverview}}. Do we need to update InvSetOverview with a special category for this set? And are there other sets that aren't covered (cursory look, can't find any)? ~ {{User:Aggelakis/Sig1}} 07:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:35, 24 February 2016
Are there really 7 enhancements in this set? And do all of the last four set bonuses kick in at 5, rather than 6, enhancements slotted? -- Sekoia 02:57, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
- Heh. My bad. (-: --GuyPerfect 04:08, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
This set seems to have broken {{IO Category List}}, probably since it doesn't use {{InvSetOverview}}. Do we need to update InvSetOverview with a special category for this set? And are there other sets that aren't covered (cursory look, can't find any)? ~ AGGE talk/cons 07:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)