Badge time.png   The Paragon Wiki Archive documents the state of City of Heroes/Villains as it existed on December 1, 2012.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Taskforce Random Recipe Roll"

From Paragon Wiki Archive
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
::The table isn't wrong, just the headers are misleading. If you look down and find Neuronic Shutdown in the list itself, it's listed as 10-30 on its specific lines. -- [[User:Aggelakis|Agge]] ([[User_talk:Aggelakis|talk]]) 22:14, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 
::The table isn't wrong, just the headers are misleading. If you look down and find Neuronic Shutdown in the list itself, it's listed as 10-30 on its specific lines. -- [[User:Aggelakis|Agge]] ([[User_talk:Aggelakis|talk]]) 22:14, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
Well, from my point of view, both headers and body are incorrect.
 +
If you look down the range 30-34 in the table, than according to table, you shouldn't get any recipes from 10-30 range. So body of the table should be corrected to reflect this fact. I would suggest, for example, to extend colored bars for level 10-30 recipes into 30-34 range.
 +
Headers, on other hand, are listing wrong number of possible recipes included in specific range.
 +
[[User:Nord Blast|Nord Blast]] 00:47, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:47, 15 January 2009

I'm not sure that table is accurate. I've been doing random rolls in the 30-34 range and got Neuronic Shutdown: Acc/Hold/Rech lvl.30 twice. According to the table I shouldn't get these.

Nord Blast 20:52, 14 January 2009 (UTC)


I see the issue - the table is capping the 10-30 sets in the 25-29 region. Indeed they can be acquired at the 30-34 level. Catwhoorg 21:23, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
There is also the same issue at the other level capped sets 15-35 can be gained from the 35-39 roll, and the level 40 capped sest from the 40-45 Catwhoorg 21:25, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
The table isn't wrong, just the headers are misleading. If you look down and find Neuronic Shutdown in the list itself, it's listed as 10-30 on its specific lines. -- Agge (talk) 22:14, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, from my point of view, both headers and body are incorrect. If you look down the range 30-34 in the table, than according to table, you shouldn't get any recipes from 10-30 range. So body of the table should be corrected to reflect this fact. I would suggest, for example, to extend colored bars for level 10-30 recipes into 30-34 range. Headers, on other hand, are listing wrong number of possible recipes included in specific range. Nord Blast 00:47, 15 January 2009 (UTC)