 The Paragon Wiki Archive documents the state of City of Heroes/Villains as it existed on December 1, 2012.
|
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Leo Poggiani"
From Paragon Wiki Archive
(added comment to date) |
m (use Project: for links) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Interesting, thought I had copied the style of mission namespace from the Glacia version? All good *shrug* [[User:Taosin|Taosin]] 06:44, 20 February 2012 (UTC) | Interesting, thought I had copied the style of mission namespace from the Glacia version? All good *shrug* [[User:Taosin|Taosin]] 06:44, 20 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
:I apparently didn't catch Glacia's incorrect use of the mission namespace. However, we don't have the actual mission names (just part 1, etc) - though they've generally matched between hero/villain, they haven't always matched, so I can't just split it out and do it right. | :I apparently didn't catch Glacia's incorrect use of the mission namespace. However, we don't have the actual mission names (just part 1, etc) - though they've generally matched between hero/villain, they haven't always matched, so I can't just split it out and do it right. | ||
| − | :Incidentally, it looks like we'll have to add a rule to [[ | + | :Incidentally, it looks like we'll have to add a rule to [[Project:Mission articles|the guidelines]] for story arcs named the same between two contacts but ''with different content'' (unlike, for instance, The Bonefire Plot which is given by multiple contacts but it's all the same content). Perhaps "Story Arc Name (Contact Name) - Mission Name"? ~ {{:User:Aggelakis/Sig1}} 06:56, 20 February 2012 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 21:13, 15 May 2020
Interesting, thought I had copied the style of mission namespace from the Glacia version? All good *shrug* Taosin 06:44, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
- I apparently didn't catch Glacia's incorrect use of the mission namespace. However, we don't have the actual mission names (just part 1, etc) - though they've generally matched between hero/villain, they haven't always matched, so I can't just split it out and do it right.
- Incidentally, it looks like we'll have to add a rule to the guidelines for story arcs named the same between two contacts but with different content (unlike, for instance, The Bonefire Plot which is given by multiple contacts but it's all the same content). Perhaps "Story Arc Name (Contact Name) - Mission Name"? ~ AGGE talk/cons 06:56, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
- Incidentally 2, "paste the content from the edit i had been working on, save. still working, folks." I had deliberately waited several hours without you making an edit before I fixed your namespace calls so that I wouldn't interrupt your editing. If you have lingering unsaved edits, please save them rather than leave them unsaved and get interrupted with edit conflicts. ~ AGGE talk/cons 07:00, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
- No worries. The first mission is named (Investigation). It then is seeming the segue like the hero version. Mind you, I am generating the content and putting it down, then I tend to go back and correct and add pierces with a second run through. We won't know the correct (or best) names for the arc until I have finished at least the first pass :> Perhaps leave it all on one page until I have finished the basic content? So we can choose the divisions that make sense?
- And yes, 'The Fate of All Men (Leo Poggiani) - Mission name" works.
- Ahh, will save more often; I need to pass the text through a text processor to operaste on it, then pass it back... slow. Very very slow compared to most. Do plan to finish tonight (i.e. within 4 hours) :( Taosin 07:07, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
Okay, there'll be three sections, going back to complete in a short while, and upload the imagery and cutscene; then finesse the result. Taosin 08:24, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
