Talk:Alignment Mission
From Paragon Wiki Archive
Revision as of 03:57, 28 March 2011 by Aggelakis (Talk | contribs) (→Mission Listing: new section -- halp!)
Collecting info on Tip Missions, layout still unsure. Possibilities:
- Each Tip has its own page with sections for the two different alignment choices
- Each Alignment has it's own page, with sections for all the tip missions of that alignment.
- All consolidated into Tip Mission page, with the sections following one of the above ideas.
Suggestions, anyone? --Ankhani 20:54, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
- I think it would be best to have at least each mission on its own page - or template, perhaps for transclusion. If you try to squeeze them all into one page, the page length is probably going to be atrociously long. Even trying to put all the missions for each alignment in single pages is probably going to be huge. Probably best just to collect those via category tags instead. --Eabrace 21:03, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
- What Eabrace said. The Tip Mission page should provide a list of links, IMO. Adrey 02:06, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
- For the missions, I agree that they should each go on their own page. I don't think they should go into template space though, since that excludes them from searches. Let them stand alone as their own articles. They should definitely be categorized. If we want to keep a list in Tip Mission or elsewhere, we can autogenerate it from the categories using DPL. -- Sekoia 18:57, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
- I'm going to start setting those up under Category:Tip Missions Adrey 20:46, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
- NOTE: I've changed the structure of the Category. Tip Missions now has two subcategories for Alignment Missions and Morality Missions. --Eabrace 20:34, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Mission Listing
I've used DPL to call a listing of the alignment missions available. However, I cannot for the life of me figure out how to get DPL to recognize the Mission: namespace (namespace=Mission
does nothing) without forcibly putting it into the title by replaceintitle=
. Halp! ~ AGGE talk/cons 03:57, 28 March 2011 (UTC)