 The Paragon Wiki Archive documents the state of City of Heroes/Villains as it existed on December 1, 2012.
|
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Force Field"
From Paragon Wiki Archive
(→Buff set) |
(→Buff set) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:: I mentioned a self toggle buff and a self+team toggle buff. Personal Force Field is the self toggle buff. Dispersion Field is the self+team toggle buff. Maybe I should have specified what I was referring to. :) I agree with most of what you said, though. Sorry for my lack of clarity! ^^ -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 06:49, 24 February 2007 (PST) | :: I mentioned a self toggle buff and a self+team toggle buff. Personal Force Field is the self toggle buff. Dispersion Field is the self+team toggle buff. Maybe I should have specified what I was referring to. :) I agree with most of what you said, though. Sorry for my lack of clarity! ^^ -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 06:49, 24 February 2007 (PST) | ||
:::Nah, re-reading, I see the misunderstanding was my own fault. I think maybe I need a nap ... ~_~' --[[User:PaxArcana|PaxArcana]] 07:17, 24 February 2007 (PST) | :::Nah, re-reading, I see the misunderstanding was my own fault. I think maybe I need a nap ... ~_~' --[[User:PaxArcana|PaxArcana]] 07:17, 24 February 2007 (PST) | ||
| + | :'Is one of the powersets' is still an awkward phrase. If it has to be factual, 'Is a powerset' would do just as fine without the odd voice. Yet it'd be vaguely wasteful to just have that there. Surely you could put "Force Field a powerset, open to Defenders as a primary power set and to Controllers and Masterminds as a secondary power set." It's a longer sentence, but it's less awkward and flows better. | ||
Revision as of 16:52, 24 February 2007
Buff set
Clearly, Force Field is a set with strong buffs. However, only 2 of the powers are ally click buffs. One is a self toggle buff, and another is a self+team toggle buff. The remaining five powers all damage, debuff, or control the enemy. That's over half the set. It doesn't seem fully accurate to introduce it as "one of the Buff powersets". It also seems misleading to phrase it the way it does, since it seems to make "Buff powersets" seem like official terminology in the same way that "Defender powersets" and "Pool powersets" are. So, I'm going to change "one of the Buff powersets" back to "one of the powersets" for now. -- Sekoia 06:31, 24 February 2007 (PST)
- My main is a Robo/FF Mastermind. I would, myself, describe the set as a mix of Buff and Control - with the control element being lamentably weak, and for the most part, generally skipped. I disagree with "self toggle buff" for Dispersion Bubble, though - it's a large PBAoE Buff, and is as useful to team-mates and other allies, as it is for the Forcefielder themself. --PaxArcana 06:40, 24 February 2007 (PST)
- I mentioned a self toggle buff and a self+team toggle buff. Personal Force Field is the self toggle buff. Dispersion Field is the self+team toggle buff. Maybe I should have specified what I was referring to. :) I agree with most of what you said, though. Sorry for my lack of clarity! ^^ -- Sekoia 06:49, 24 February 2007 (PST)
- Nah, re-reading, I see the misunderstanding was my own fault. I think maybe I need a nap ... ~_~' --PaxArcana 07:17, 24 February 2007 (PST)
- I mentioned a self toggle buff and a self+team toggle buff. Personal Force Field is the self toggle buff. Dispersion Field is the self+team toggle buff. Maybe I should have specified what I was referring to. :) I agree with most of what you said, though. Sorry for my lack of clarity! ^^ -- Sekoia 06:49, 24 February 2007 (PST)
- 'Is one of the powersets' is still an awkward phrase. If it has to be factual, 'Is a powerset' would do just as fine without the odd voice. Yet it'd be vaguely wasteful to just have that there. Surely you could put "Force Field a powerset, open to Defenders as a primary power set and to Controllers and Masterminds as a secondary power set." It's a longer sentence, but it's less awkward and flows better.
