Difference between revisions of "Paragon Wiki Archive talk:Contributor First Edits"
From Paragon Wiki Archive
(→Last Edit) |
m |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: Hmm. That's a little trickier since the data won't be updated in real-time. Example: if the dump is 6 months old and they made a last edit 5 months ago, they might be due for a badge even though it doesn't look like they are. What do you think? -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 04:51, 14 July 2013 (UTC) | : Hmm. That's a little trickier since the data won't be updated in real-time. Example: if the dump is 6 months old and they made a last edit 5 months ago, they might be due for a badge even though it doesn't look like they are. What do you think? -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 04:51, 14 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::If nothing else, it makes it very easy to spot people that are ''definitely'' eligible for a badge, leaving only the ones you aren't sure about for manual investigation. It still cuts down on the leg work required. --[[User:Eabrace|Eabrace]] [[File:Healthbar notify phone.png|20px|link=User talk:Eabrace]] 02:26, 15 July 2013 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 02:26, 15 July 2013
Last Edit
Adding a "Last Edit" column might be useful. That way we can see if a user has been active in the last year and skip over users that haven't made any edits in the last 12 months. --Eabrace 20:09, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
- Hmm. That's a little trickier since the data won't be updated in real-time. Example: if the dump is 6 months old and they made a last edit 5 months ago, they might be due for a badge even though it doesn't look like they are. What do you think? -- Sekoia 04:51, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
- If nothing else, it makes it very easy to spot people that are definitely eligible for a badge, leaving only the ones you aren't sure about for manual investigation. It still cuts down on the leg work required. --Eabrace 02:26, 15 July 2013 (UTC)