 The Paragon Wiki Archive documents the state of City of Heroes/Villains as it existed on December 1, 2012.
|
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lore Slot Abilities"
From Paragon Wiki Archive
PocketNerd (Talk | contribs) (DPS comparison obsolete?) |
(+reply) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
So the DPS comparison section is probably obsolete, or even promoting misinformation; should we remove it? [[User:PocketNerd|PocketNerd]] 13:10, 3 April 2012 (UTC) | So the DPS comparison section is probably obsolete, or even promoting misinformation; should we remove it? [[User:PocketNerd|PocketNerd]] 13:10, 3 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I added an EdNote to that section discussing the issue and linking to Hawk's post. Hopefully that will push someone into re-collecting the data and then coming back with a forum post correcting it, or somesuch. Of course, someone may follow me with a better way to handle it, but for now, I think that the information presented still has some level of merit. —[[User:Thirty7|Thirty7]] [[File:Talk-Icon.jpg|link=User talk:Thirty7]] 13:24, 3 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:24, 3 April 2012
For the Cimeroran pets, don't you mean to link this page:
http://wiki.cohtitan.com/wiki/Cimeroran_Traitors
instead of this:
http://wiki.cohtitan.com/wiki/Cimeroran ?
Just asking. Freewaydog 13:02, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
DPS comparison obsolete?
The post cited for the Lore Slot Abilities#DPS of Lore Pets section is almost a year old, and according to Arbiter Hawk on the coh.com fora, "There's been at least one significant Lore DPS balance pass since this compilation".[1] He goes on to write "It's probably worth re-evaluating Lore pet DPS rankings if what you're interested in is maximum DPS performance."
So the DPS comparison section is probably obsolete, or even promoting misinformation; should we remove it? PocketNerd 13:10, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
- I added an EdNote to that section discussing the issue and linking to Hawk's post. Hopefully that will push someone into re-collecting the data and then coming back with a forum post correcting it, or somesuch. Of course, someone may follow me with a better way to handle it, but for now, I think that the information presented still has some level of merit. —Thirty7
13:24, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
