 The Paragon Wiki Archive documents the state of City of Heroes/Villains as it existed on December 1, 2012.
|
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Leo Poggiani"
From Paragon Wiki Archive
(comment on namepsace) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Interesting, thought I had copied the style of mission namespace from the Glacia version? All good *shrug* [[User:Taosin|Taosin]] 06:44, 20 February 2012 (UTC) | Interesting, thought I had copied the style of mission namespace from the Glacia version? All good *shrug* [[User:Taosin|Taosin]] 06:44, 20 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I apparently didn't catch Glacia's incorrect use of the mission namespace. However, we don't have the actual mission names (just part 1, etc) - though they've generally matched between hero/villain, they haven't always matched, so I can't just split it out and do it right. | ||
| + | :Incidentally, it looks like we'll have to add a rule to [[Paragon Wiki:Mission articles|the guidelines]] for story arcs named the same between two contacts but ''with different content'' (unlike, for instance, The Bonefire Plot which is given by multiple contacts but it's all the same content). Perhaps "Story Arc Name (Contact Name) - Mission Name"? ~ {{:User:Aggelakis/Sig1}} 06:56, 20 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 06:56, 20 February 2012
Interesting, thought I had copied the style of mission namespace from the Glacia version? All good *shrug* Taosin 06:44, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
- I apparently didn't catch Glacia's incorrect use of the mission namespace. However, we don't have the actual mission names (just part 1, etc) - though they've generally matched between hero/villain, they haven't always matched, so I can't just split it out and do it right.
- Incidentally, it looks like we'll have to add a rule to the guidelines for story arcs named the same between two contacts but with different content (unlike, for instance, The Bonefire Plot which is given by multiple contacts but it's all the same content). Perhaps "Story Arc Name (Contact Name) - Mission Name"? ~ AGGE talk/cons 06:56, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
