 The Paragon Wiki Archive documents the state of City of Heroes/Villains as it existed on December 1, 2012.
|
Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Praetorians"
From Paragon Wiki Archive
(Created page with "I've gone through all the original Praetorians archvillains and given them an initial consistency pass, and done some pretty significant structure work on a few of the articl...") |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* [[Siege]] | * [[Siege]] | ||
And I think that was it, though I could be wrong. [[User:Draeth Darkstar|Draeth Darkstar]] 01:03, 12 September 2010 (UTC) | And I think that was it, though I could be wrong. [[User:Draeth Darkstar|Draeth Darkstar]] 01:03, 12 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Another issue to be raised - should there be a categorical distinction between (what are now called) the Praetors (the old archvillains), and Praetorians (including all the contacts/trainers/enemy groups/etc) in general? [[User:Draeth Darkstar|Draeth Darkstar]] 05:30, 14 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 05:30, 14 September 2010
I've gone through all the original Praetorians archvillains and given them an initial consistency pass, and done some pretty significant structure work on a few of the articles, but there's no information regarding several of them in the new Praetoria content at all. So, I'm requesting any Going Rogue information, if it exists, regarding:
And I think that was it, though I could be wrong. Draeth Darkstar 01:03, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
Another issue to be raised - should there be a categorical distinction between (what are now called) the Praetors (the old archvillains), and Praetorians (including all the contacts/trainers/enemy groups/etc) in general? Draeth Darkstar 05:30, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
