Difference between revisions of "User talk:Baalus Seth/Shield Defense"
From Paragon Wiki Archive
(New page: I like your ideas, as I find the current "Phalanx Fighting" power to be a skip. I do question putting more than one attack power in a defense set, however...though I'm amiss about a replac...) |
Baalus Seth (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I like your ideas, as I find the current "Phalanx Fighting" power to be a skip. I do question putting more than one attack power in a defense set, however...though I'm amiss about a replacement. [[User:BlodFang|BlodFang]] 17:46, 9 November 2008 (UTC) | I like your ideas, as I find the current "Phalanx Fighting" power to be a skip. I do question putting more than one attack power in a defense set, however...though I'm amiss about a replacement. [[User:BlodFang|BlodFang]] 17:46, 9 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
+ | :It's not really an attack power. It's a damage mitigation power if anything. I envision Shield as heavily relying on knocking its target down. - [[User:Baalus Seth|Baalus Seth]] 18:23, 9 November 2008 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 18:23, 9 November 2008
I like your ideas, as I find the current "Phalanx Fighting" power to be a skip. I do question putting more than one attack power in a defense set, however...though I'm amiss about a replacement. BlodFang 17:46, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- It's not really an attack power. It's a damage mitigation power if anything. I envision Shield as heavily relying on knocking its target down. - Baalus Seth 18:23, 9 November 2008 (UTC)