Difference between revisions of "User talk:DM Yarrow"
(Technical Issues) |
m (→Technical Issues) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
=== Technical Issues === | === Technical Issues === | ||
We aren't going to update the [[Technical Issues]] page with "current events" news. It's there just to show where users should go if things are not performing the way they should. See the biglong chat on [[User talk:A D Monroe III]] for reasons. -- [[User:Aggelakis|Aggelakis]] 16:54, 2 October 2008 (UTC) | We aren't going to update the [[Technical Issues]] page with "current events" news. It's there just to show where users should go if things are not performing the way they should. See the biglong chat on [[User talk:A D Monroe III]] for reasons. -- [[User:Aggelakis|Aggelakis]] 16:54, 2 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | seen it, read it, best place to put that info in the short term as it certainly wasn't worth putting on the main news page. Seeing as i only found out about the forums by going on my sg's forums and getting the question asked by members it seemed pertient at the time. Also is the fact that i deleted it once it became non-relevant, because believe me, if the same had happened statesside some one would have done the same. But moving on, no need to dig up that old bone. *locks the box on that matter* -- [[User:DM Yarrow|DM Yarrow]] 17:02, 2 October 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:02, 2 October 2008
note to self
work on Hero Corps - Done. Inserted a link to Hero Corps Field Analyst#Hero Corps Field Analysts to save typing it all out again.
Technical Issues
We aren't going to update the Technical Issues page with "current events" news. It's there just to show where users should go if things are not performing the way they should. See the biglong chat on User talk:A D Monroe III for reasons. -- Aggelakis 16:54, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
seen it, read it, best place to put that info in the short term as it certainly wasn't worth putting on the main news page. Seeing as i only found out about the forums by going on my sg's forums and getting the question asked by members it seemed pertient at the time. Also is the fact that i deleted it once it became non-relevant, because believe me, if the same had happened statesside some one would have done the same. But moving on, no need to dig up that old bone. *locks the box on that matter* -- DM Yarrow 17:02, 2 October 2008 (UTC)