Difference between revisions of "User talk:Aggelakis/Hecatomb"
From Paragon Wiki Archive
m (comment) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== (Recipe) == | == (Recipe) == | ||
I know this is very much a WIP... but I wanted to toss out a quick comment. When you use a parenthetical after the link, it kinda looks like you are calling the first item a Recipe. -I- know that isn't the case, but to the untrained eye, it might. That is precisely the reason I tried to find an alternative way to do it on my example in my Sandbox version. Just a thought. —[[User:Thirty7|Thirty7]] [[File:Talk-Icon.jpg|link=User talk:Thirty7]] 19:04, 11 April 2012 (UTC) | I know this is very much a WIP... but I wanted to toss out a quick comment. When you use a parenthetical after the link, it kinda looks like you are calling the first item a Recipe. -I- know that isn't the case, but to the untrained eye, it might. That is precisely the reason I tried to find an alternative way to do it on my example in my Sandbox version. Just a thought. —[[User:Thirty7|Thirty7]] [[File:Talk-Icon.jpg|link=User talk:Thirty7]] 19:04, 11 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
+ | :I absolutely hate the table format in your version (please no offense!) so I'm trying to find a more elegant way to present it. ~ {{:User:Aggelakis/Sig1}} 19:17, 11 April 2012 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 19:17, 11 April 2012
(Recipe)
I know this is very much a WIP... but I wanted to toss out a quick comment. When you use a parenthetical after the link, it kinda looks like you are calling the first item a Recipe. -I- know that isn't the case, but to the untrained eye, it might. That is precisely the reason I tried to find an alternative way to do it on my example in my Sandbox version. Just a thought. —Thirty7 19:04, 11 April 2012 (UTC)