 The Paragon Wiki Archive documents the state of City of Heroes/Villains as it existed on December 1, 2012.
|
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bobcat"
From Paragon Wiki Archive
(Query on Information vs. Description) |
m |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Her Primal Earth and Praetorian descriptions match. The information is repeated on the page, what's the best option here? One of them should go? [[User:Taosin|Taosin]] 13:06, 13 September 2010 (UTC) | Her Primal Earth and Praetorian descriptions match. The information is repeated on the page, what's the best option here? One of them should go? [[User:Taosin|Taosin]] 13:06, 13 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Good question. My initial reaction is to say that I think it would be a good idea to handle the information the same way it was handled for [[Anti-Matter]] and [[Mother Mayhem]], placing contact description and Primal Earth description in the same section. That being said, in Anti-Matter's article, the information was consolidated under "Description" while in Mother Mayhem's article it was placed under "Information". I think I like it better under the Information heading, but it might be best to bring this up on the forums to get a better feel for the overall group consensus. --[[User:Eabrace|Eabrace]] [[File:Healthbar notify phone.png|20px|link=User talk:Eabrace]] 14:42, 13 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:42, 13 September 2010
Description vs. Information
Her Primal Earth and Praetorian descriptions match. The information is repeated on the page, what's the best option here? One of them should go? Taosin 13:06, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- Good question. My initial reaction is to say that I think it would be a good idea to handle the information the same way it was handled for Anti-Matter and Mother Mayhem, placing contact description and Primal Earth description in the same section. That being said, in Anti-Matter's article, the information was consolidated under "Description" while in Mother Mayhem's article it was placed under "Information". I think I like it better under the Information heading, but it might be best to bring this up on the forums to get a better feel for the overall group consensus. --Eabrace
14:42, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
