Badge time.png   The Paragon Wiki Archive documents the state of City of Heroes/Villains as it existed on December 1, 2012.

Difference between revisions of "User talk:Martavius"

From Paragon Wiki Archive
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Redirected page to User:Aggelakis)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Martavius: Energy Blast/Sonic Resonance Corruptor. Level 40, Champion.<BR>
+
#redirect [[User:Aggelakis]]
Steel Wang: Ninjas/Poison Mastermind. Level 27, Infinity.<BR>
+
(redirect deliberately in place ~Agge)
Aggelakis: Empathy/Archery Defender. Level 24, Justice.<BR>
+
 
+
== Level restrictions vs auto-exemplar ==
+
 
+
The only level restrictions in a PvP zones are the minimum.  It is auto-Exemplaring/auto-sidekick/etc that raises or lowers all players in the zone to a specific level.  A specific level that is not the same as the zone's level restriction on any of the zones.  B-Bay, level-restriction == 15, but auto-SK/EX == 25.  These are very different things. - [[User:Sister Leortha|Sister Leortha]] 11:46, 19 October 2006 (PDT)
+
:Since Sidekick is linked in the previous sentence, and now fully explains the Sidekick feature including PvP/SF auto-SK/EX, I maintain that having the big block of confusing acronyms is unnecessary. [[User:Martavius|Martavius]] 11:49, 19 October 2006 (PDT)
+
 
+
: Actually, as I think about it a bit more, I have never before heard the term "Level Restrictions" applied to the PvP zones.  The term I always heard was "Minimum Level" or something similar.  "Level Restrictions" has generally been a term used for TFs and SFs, which have both a minimum and a maximum.  PvP zones really don't have level restrictions in the same sense.  They have no maximum level, just a minimum, and a effective level to which all characters in the zone are raised or lowered.
+
: When you get right down to it, my problem it really with the term Level Restriction, since IMHO it does not at all reflect the mechanism (auto-exemplaring) that is allowing people to ToT in the zone.  My problem is *not* with removing the acronym block, in and of itself.  But if it is removed, it IMHO needs to be replaced with something that actually reflects the mechanism at work. - [[User:Sister Leortha|Sister Leortha]] 11:53, 19 October 2006 (PDT)
+

Latest revision as of 06:08, 1 June 2014

Redirect to:

(redirect deliberately in place ~Agge)