Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Navbox Incarnate Slots"

Latest revision as of 17:30, 13 June 2012

Good Idea

Might I just say that this is a brilliant idea... something I shoulda thought about before.  :) —Thirty7 22:56, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Future Abilities

Any reason we can't include the Abilities that have yet to be released in the interface? Genesis, Mind, Vitae and Omega? To my mind at least, there is no harm in including them for sake of completeness (since they are visible on Live) and just not linking to anything... yet (not red-links, mind, but black un-linked text). —Thirty7 00:49, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Good idea. Makes it easy to remember to update this template if they don't link anywhere. lol ~ AGGE talk/cons 00:56, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Heh, I'da done it myself, but didn't want them to just be removed if folks didn't agree with me.  :) —Thirty7 03:10, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Other Pages

Does anyone else think that we should possibly include a line for Incarnate Mechanics such as Incarnate Experience and Incarnate Components as well as a line for Incarnate Trials and one for Incarnate Zones (which would currently just be Dark Astoria? -Draeth Darkstar 23:36, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

I could see the value in that. There's already a template for the trials, {{Navbox Incarnate Trials}}. If we want to make a template that covers the whole Incarnate system (slots, abilities, experience, crafting, zones, trials), perhaps we should merge these two templates into a new one named {{Navbox Incarnate System}}? -- Sekoia 00:30, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Well, we already have Template:Navbox Incarnate Trials which could be renamed to Incarnate Tasks or some such and include Dark Astoria, but I don't think that this Navbox is a good place for that information. Mayhap including the XP and something related to Components might be good for this Navbox though... since the ideas of Slotting and Components go hand in hand. —  Talk · Cont 00:32, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

It looks like you two edited right about at the same time, deleting Sekoia's edit, so I've re-added it.

I think we should merge the navboxes into one overarching Incarnate System navbox for better ease-of-access; I think that would make the pages feel more interconnected and would make it easier for players new to the whole thing to find all the pertinent information, as it's a bit scattered right now. -Draeth Darkstar 00:50, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

I created a quick merged version at {{Navbox Incarnate System}} as a starting point. I didn't apply it to any pages, pending further discussion. -- Sekoia 04:39, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

The structure of that looks good. I made up some slight variations on the Talk page for that. Feel free to mess with that. I am debating whether I like the Content > Zones/Trials breakdown, or the Trial > Praetorian/Battalion and then Zones > Dark Astoria as a seperate entry breakdown better. I think the second has more room for variability as more things get added... —  Talk · Cont 08:11, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Further, I don't like that almost all of the GroupNames had the word Incarnate in them... considering the heading, that seemed redundant to me. —  Talk · Cont 08:13, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

I've added a suggested version based on Thiry7's edits on that talk page as well. -Draeth Darkstar 09:57, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

I nearly removed the word "Incarnate" from GroupNames as well but had hesitated since it was in the original, heh. -- Sekoia 17:30, 13 June 2012 (UTC)