 The Paragon Wiki Archive documents the state of City of Heroes/Villains as it existed on December 1, 2012.
|
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lore Slot Abilities"
From Paragon Wiki Archive
(+reply) |
Blondeshell (Talk | contribs) m (→DPS comparison obsolete?: update link) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== DPS comparison obsolete? == | == DPS comparison obsolete? == | ||
| − | The post cited for the [[Lore Slot Abilities#DPS of Lore Pets]] section is almost a year old, and according to Arbiter Hawk on the coh.com fora, "There's been at least one significant Lore DPS balance pass since this compilation".[http://boards.cityofheroes.com/showthread.php?p=4169028 | + | The post cited for the [[Lore Slot Abilities#DPS of Lore Pets]] section is almost a year old, and according to Arbiter Hawk on the coh.com fora, "There's been at least one significant Lore DPS balance pass since this compilation".[http://web.archive.org/web/20120911133513/http://boards.cityofheroes.com/showthread.php?p=4169028] He goes on to write "It's probably worth re-evaluating Lore pet DPS rankings if what you're interested in is maximum DPS performance." |
So the DPS comparison section is probably obsolete, or even promoting misinformation; should we remove it? [[User:PocketNerd|PocketNerd]] 13:10, 3 April 2012 (UTC) | So the DPS comparison section is probably obsolete, or even promoting misinformation; should we remove it? [[User:PocketNerd|PocketNerd]] 13:10, 3 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
:I added an EdNote to that section discussing the issue and linking to Hawk's post. Hopefully that will push someone into re-collecting the data and then coming back with a forum post correcting it, or somesuch. Of course, someone may follow me with a better way to handle it, but for now, I think that the information presented still has some level of merit. —[[User:Thirty7|Thirty7]] [[File:Talk-Icon.jpg|link=User talk:Thirty7]] 13:24, 3 April 2012 (UTC) | :I added an EdNote to that section discussing the issue and linking to Hawk's post. Hopefully that will push someone into re-collecting the data and then coming back with a forum post correcting it, or somesuch. Of course, someone may follow me with a better way to handle it, but for now, I think that the information presented still has some level of merit. —[[User:Thirty7|Thirty7]] [[File:Talk-Icon.jpg|link=User talk:Thirty7]] 13:24, 3 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::While Arbiter Hawk did note that 8 of the Lore pets were finally coded to work with Interface procs, remember that the DPS chart was created without having any of them slotted. Still, 8 of them now take advantage of the Alpha along with the rest which did work, which means their endurance might change their DPS... ugh. :3 For the most part, the top tier ones are still accurate, but not sure on the rest. Hoping someone will create new DPS readings for the lore pets some time soon. [[User:Sera404|Sera404]] 18:26, 3 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:35, 3 November 2013
For the Cimeroran pets, don't you mean to link this page:
http://wiki.cohtitan.com/wiki/Cimeroran_Traitors
instead of this:
http://wiki.cohtitan.com/wiki/Cimeroran ?
Just asking. Freewaydog 13:02, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
DPS comparison obsolete?
The post cited for the Lore Slot Abilities#DPS of Lore Pets section is almost a year old, and according to Arbiter Hawk on the coh.com fora, "There's been at least one significant Lore DPS balance pass since this compilation".[1] He goes on to write "It's probably worth re-evaluating Lore pet DPS rankings if what you're interested in is maximum DPS performance."
So the DPS comparison section is probably obsolete, or even promoting misinformation; should we remove it? PocketNerd 13:10, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
- I added an EdNote to that section discussing the issue and linking to Hawk's post. Hopefully that will push someone into re-collecting the data and then coming back with a forum post correcting it, or somesuch. Of course, someone may follow me with a better way to handle it, but for now, I think that the information presented still has some level of merit. —Thirty7
13:24, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
- While Arbiter Hawk did note that 8 of the Lore pets were finally coded to work with Interface procs, remember that the DPS chart was created without having any of them slotted. Still, 8 of them now take advantage of the Alpha along with the rest which did work, which means their endurance might change their DPS... ugh. :3 For the most part, the top tier ones are still accurate, but not sure on the rest. Hoping someone will create new DPS readings for the lore pets some time soon. Sera404 18:26, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
