 The Paragon Wiki Archive documents the state of City of Heroes/Villains as it existed on December 1, 2012.
|
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Black Scorpion"
m |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
There are a couple of misspellings in The DESTINY Raids souvenir - mistakes made in the actual in-game text itself. As a Wiki noob in general, what's the policy on this? Do we correct the errors or leave them be? -Koi | There are a couple of misspellings in The DESTINY Raids souvenir - mistakes made in the actual in-game text itself. As a Wiki noob in general, what's the policy on this? Do we correct the errors or leave them be? -Koi | ||
| − | Why not just | + | Why not just leave them as they are in game (with the error) and [sic] them? That's how it works in most every other written work. [[User:Zxaos|Zxaos]] 07:59, 24 July 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:00, 24 July 2008
Contents
Origin
Black Scorpion sells both Technology and Science single origin enhancements. This makes sense because of only having four patrons and 5 origins. I went ahead and put him in both origin contact categories. The only problem is that if I use the contact overview, an 'N' for origin will add an unspecified origin category for him. -- Snorii
- Yep, there are limitations to Contact Overview when it comes to extra origins and extended levels ranges. I'll fix it up with another option to remove the Unspecified Origin (How about None?). Things like that are best handled manually. Ya' just can't cover everything all the time. But Contact overview will be getting an upgrade soon and all the YN parts will become obsolete. -- StarGeekTalk page 13:18, 19 September 2006 (PDT)
Nishruu's notes
Notes
- not in order about 3 mission up from last post ,after level 45
mission :Raid portal corp
I deleted Nishruu's notes about the Portal Corp Raid mission since I've added it to the actual page Zxaos 19:06, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
There are a couple of misspellings in The DESTINY Raids souvenir - mistakes made in the actual in-game text itself. As a Wiki noob in general, what's the policy on this? Do we correct the errors or leave them be? -Koi
Why not just leave them as they are in game (with the error) and [sic] them? That's how it works in most every other written work. Zxaos 07:59, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
