 The Paragon Wiki Archive documents the state of City of Heroes/Villains as it existed on December 1, 2012.
|
Difference between revisions of "Template talk:IncarnateListCommonComponent"
From Paragon Wiki Archive
(redlink dpl error?) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Since Shards are common components and are used in other common components, I added {{tl|IncarnateListCommonComponentB}} to the template in order to list those other common components appropriately. However, now on the other component pages (e.g. [[Ancient Nictus Fragment Component]]), Shards are listed as Used In, with a redlink to a dpl call. I can't find anything in these templates to fix that error. ~ {{:User:Aggelakis/Sig1}} 00:16, 17 December 2010 (UTC) | Since Shards are common components and are used in other common components, I added {{tl|IncarnateListCommonComponentB}} to the template in order to list those other common components appropriately. However, now on the other component pages (e.g. [[Ancient Nictus Fragment Component]]), Shards are listed as Used In, with a redlink to a dpl call. I can't find anything in these templates to fix that error. ~ {{:User:Aggelakis/Sig1}} 00:16, 17 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I think I've seen something similar to that before when tinkering with DPL calls. Seems there's a default template missing somewhere. --[[User:Eabrace|Eabrace]] [[File:Healthbar notify phone.png|20px|link=User talk:Eabrace]] 00:30, 17 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:30, 17 December 2010
Since Shards are common components and are used in other common components, I added {{IncarnateListCommonComponentB}} to the template in order to list those other common components appropriately. However, now on the other component pages (e.g. Ancient Nictus Fragment Component), Shards are listed as Used In, with a redlink to a dpl call. I can't find anything in these templates to fix that error. ~ AGGE talk/cons 00:16, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- I think I've seen something similar to that before when tinkering with DPL calls. Seems there's a default template missing somewhere. --Eabrace
00:30, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
