Badge time.png   The Paragon Wiki Archive documents the state of City of Heroes/Villains as it existed on December 1, 2012.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Server Transfer"

From Paragon Wiki Archive
Jump to: navigation, search
(Move lots to Historical?: wordification... must be sleepy)
(Move lots to Historical?)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
:Reading the article as it is now with the all of the dates updating the phases the item has gone through to get it to where it is today, it does read like a Historical section.  I have to agree with your take on it, Tao.  Alternatively, you could do some heavy editing to remove the "history" feel of the article and simply move some specific comments regarding dates to a Historical section.  I like your version better, though.  {{User:Thirty7/Sig}} 12:51, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 
:Reading the article as it is now with the all of the dates updating the phases the item has gone through to get it to where it is today, it does read like a Historical section.  I have to agree with your take on it, Tao.  Alternatively, you could do some heavy editing to remove the "history" feel of the article and simply move some specific comments regarding dates to a Historical section.  I like your version better, though.  {{User:Thirty7/Sig}} 12:51, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 +
 +
: I think moving stuff to a Historical section is a great idea. -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 19:07, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:07, 20 June 2012

What else should we cover in here? --Colonel Jasmine 13:41, 30 October 2007 (EDT)

Move lots to Historical?

As I see it, much of the material in Overview and Server Transfer Discounts should be moved to a Historical section? It reads almost definitively as what "Historical" is. It no longer applies to the current game (etc); but can then be found by those interested.

This focuses the main part on what players need to know now.

Mention should be made (perhaps?) that server discounts sometimes occur during weekly sales and so forth, and to keep an eye on the official announcements/news.

Just my two cents, thoughts? Taosin 10:36, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Reading the article as it is now with the all of the dates updating the phases the item has gone through to get it to where it is today, it does read like a Historical section. I have to agree with your take on it, Tao. Alternatively, you could do some heavy editing to remove the "history" feel of the article and simply move some specific comments regarding dates to a Historical section. I like your version better, though. — Pill-37.png Talk · Cont 12:51, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
I think moving stuff to a Historical section is a great idea. -- Sekoia 19:07, 20 June 2012 (UTC)