 The Paragon Wiki Archive documents the state of City of Heroes/Villains as it existed on December 1, 2012.
|
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Paragon Market"
From Paragon Wiki Archive
Felderburg (Talk | contribs) |
Felderburg (Talk | contribs) (→Item Links) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:One page per item type, regardless if there are multiple purchasing options in multiple amounts. I suggest the article be simply "Article Name" unless there's something there already, then "Article Name (Paragon Market)" instead. For instance, [[Character Slot]] and [[Character Slot (Paragon Market)]]. ~ {{:User:Aggelakis/Sig1}} 21:01, 21 September 2011 (UTC) | :One page per item type, regardless if there are multiple purchasing options in multiple amounts. I suggest the article be simply "Article Name" unless there's something there already, then "Article Name (Paragon Market)" instead. For instance, [[Character Slot]] and [[Character Slot (Paragon Market)]]. ~ {{:User:Aggelakis/Sig1}} 21:01, 21 September 2011 (UTC) | ||
| − | ::But take the Character Slots: [[Character Slot (Paragon Market)]] is going to have little, if anything, other than a redirect or "See Also: [[Character Slot]]" | + | ::But take the Character Slots: [[Character Slot (Paragon Market)]] is going to have little, if anything, other than a redirect or "See Also: [[Character Slot]]". So I guess I don't see the point, for items like Character Slot, where the Market item differs in no fundamental way from the "actual" item, to have their own separate Market pages. [[User:Felderburg|Felderburg]] 21:08, 21 September 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:08, 21 September 2011
Item Links
So it makes sense for some items to link to an actual item, and that item's page would have more info if needed. But do things like "Character Slot x1" "Character Slot x2" and "Character Slot x5" need their own links? Can't they just link either directly to Character Slot or a page like "Character Slot (Market Item)"? Felderburg 20:58, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
- One page per item type, regardless if there are multiple purchasing options in multiple amounts. I suggest the article be simply "Article Name" unless there's something there already, then "Article Name (Paragon Market)" instead. For instance, Character Slot and Character Slot (Paragon Market). ~ AGGE talk/cons 21:01, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
- But take the Character Slots: Character Slot (Paragon Market) is going to have little, if anything, other than a redirect or "See Also: Character Slot". So I guess I don't see the point, for items like Character Slot, where the Market item differs in no fundamental way from the "actual" item, to have their own separate Market pages. Felderburg 21:08, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
