Difference between revisions of "Talk:Component"
From Paragon Wiki Archive
(True) |
Sleepykitty (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
This is true. Since I'm not personally too familiar with bases, I'm not sure I'm the best person to write or edit the article on that, though. I'm actually kind of hoping that someone else will eventually take over all the maintenance of the base articles. :-) Until then, I just started to document the salvage to have something to speak of. | This is true. Since I'm not personally too familiar with bases, I'm not sure I'm the best person to write or edit the article on that, though. I'm actually kind of hoping that someone else will eventually take over all the maintenance of the base articles. :-) Until then, I just started to document the salvage to have something to speak of. | ||
+ | |||
+ | : <.< err... these are all listed alphabetically, wouldn't it be better to list them first by teir, then alp? |
Revision as of 19:21, 22 May 2006
Personally, I'd find it very useful if there were a full list of the formulas used to create these components, and the specific worktable necessary. - Man With The Plan
True
This is true. Since I'm not personally too familiar with bases, I'm not sure I'm the best person to write or edit the article on that, though. I'm actually kind of hoping that someone else will eventually take over all the maintenance of the base articles. :-) Until then, I just started to document the salvage to have something to speak of.
- <.< err... these are all listed alphabetically, wouldn't it be better to list them first by teir, then alp?