 The Paragon Wiki Archive documents the state of City of Heroes/Villains as it existed on December 1, 2012.
|
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Caleb"
From Paragon Wiki Archive
Warriorpoet (Talk | contribs) (Caleb is NOT the only summonable monster) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It is untrue that Caleb is the only confirmed monster that can be "summoned" ALL CoV monsters are summonable. Deathsurge by killing those Cap Daemons, Ghost by killing Scrapyarders, and Cabel by killing Spectral Demons. Cuppa stated it was a key difference between the two. Villains are proactive - causing mayhem. Heroes are reactive - not preventing it, but fixing it. Besides, it is out of character for a hero to want to summon a monster. | It is untrue that Caleb is the only confirmed monster that can be "summoned" ALL CoV monsters are summonable. Deathsurge by killing those Cap Daemons, Ghost by killing Scrapyarders, and Cabel by killing Spectral Demons. Cuppa stated it was a key difference between the two. Villains are proactive - causing mayhem. Heroes are reactive - not preventing it, but fixing it. Besides, it is out of character for a hero to want to summon a monster. | ||
| + | |||
| + | : I don't play CoV enough to know, but I haven't heard any verification that the others can be spawned, just rumors and hearsay. Do you have a reference to cite? --[[User:StarGeek|StarGeek]] 23:54, 24 April 2006 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 06:54, 25 April 2006
It is untrue that Caleb is the only confirmed monster that can be "summoned" ALL CoV monsters are summonable. Deathsurge by killing those Cap Daemons, Ghost by killing Scrapyarders, and Cabel by killing Spectral Demons. Cuppa stated it was a key difference between the two. Villains are proactive - causing mayhem. Heroes are reactive - not preventing it, but fixing it. Besides, it is out of character for a hero to want to summon a monster.
- I don't play CoV enough to know, but I haven't heard any verification that the others can be spawned, just rumors and hearsay. Do you have a reference to cite? --StarGeek 23:54, 24 April 2006 (PDT)
