Difference between revisions of "User talk:Joshex"
(→Newest Info) |
(→Newest Info) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Project Bane is still in the workings, it's more of a spiritual successor to CoH than it was before, however it has nothing to do with the CoX universe and functions off a significantly different statistical system. The game has a name but as with most things I have yet to file for intellectual properties. | Project Bane is still in the workings, it's more of a spiritual successor to CoH than it was before, however it has nothing to do with the CoX universe and functions off a significantly different statistical system. The game has a name but as with most things I have yet to file for intellectual properties. | ||
− | The current dev focus is the powersets and chat system. | + | The current dev focus is the powersets and chat system. |
The current dev focus should be tree graphical geometry while there are still leaves on most of them (notes have been taken but a living reference is still usually necessary, and pictures don't always produce the best results). | The current dev focus should be tree graphical geometry while there are still leaves on most of them (notes have been taken but a living reference is still usually necessary, and pictures don't always produce the best results). | ||
The game is not in a release state, it is again in pieces and due for a complete rebuild based around the chat system as a core rather than a utility. | The game is not in a release state, it is again in pieces and due for a complete rebuild based around the chat system as a core rather than a utility. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Amendment: I actually want to know how COH powersets especially armor sets were built, I have my own system for building sets but can adapt-in a coh style system as well, it wont be exact to the decimal but round about close. My current goal before moving forwards is to create an option for users to be able to use CoX mimicking powersets for nostalgia's sake, though I can already say that they wont be as effective as they were in CoX, still I'd like to make it an available option, but for that to happen I need to know some sort of equivalence or unequivalence of CoX Statistical attribution to powers/sets. I really don't want to have to nerf the system later so I'm taking care to make it balanced from the start, that means for everything there's a balance and a reason, everything has things it equals or conflicts with and thus all numbers are equal though different. | ||
Second Game; | Second Game; |
Revision as of 15:52, 8 November 2016
Welcome!
Hello, Joshex, and welcome to the Paragon Wiki! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Feel free to fill out your personal user page so we can get to know you. There is a collection of Userboxes you can easily add there. Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.
Don't forget to drop by and introduce yourself in the forum. If you need help, ask me on my talk page or ask on the forums and someone will try to to answer your questions shortly.
Also, make sure you take a look at the Help page. There are a lot of preloaded images, missions, and contact info templates, and what you want to add might already be there.
Again, welcome! -- ~ AGGE talk/cons 05:55, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Newest Info
Only the newest update will be available here old ones will be erased, replies are welcomed and may not be purged.
Project Bane is still in the workings, it's more of a spiritual successor to CoH than it was before, however it has nothing to do with the CoX universe and functions off a significantly different statistical system. The game has a name but as with most things I have yet to file for intellectual properties.
The current dev focus is the powersets and chat system.
The current dev focus should be tree graphical geometry while there are still leaves on most of them (notes have been taken but a living reference is still usually necessary, and pictures don't always produce the best results).
The game is not in a release state, it is again in pieces and due for a complete rebuild based around the chat system as a core rather than a utility.
Amendment: I actually want to know how COH powersets especially armor sets were built, I have my own system for building sets but can adapt-in a coh style system as well, it wont be exact to the decimal but round about close. My current goal before moving forwards is to create an option for users to be able to use CoX mimicking powersets for nostalgia's sake, though I can already say that they wont be as effective as they were in CoX, still I'd like to make it an available option, but for that to happen I need to know some sort of equivalence or unequivalence of CoX Statistical attribution to powers/sets. I really don't want to have to nerf the system later so I'm taking care to make it balanced from the start, that means for everything there's a balance and a reason, everything has things it equals or conflicts with and thus all numbers are equal though different.
Second Game;
There is a second game project in the workings, it is not an online game, right now its codename is actionadeventuremessaround but is not entirely unrelated to project bane, some of it's mechanics will be used in Bane, and the main character will be a character in Bane (Hero or Villain is not decided yet). The game is an action adventure game, I've always wanted to make one, so; Why not? it aims to be a comedy of sorts (and may not be suitable for all ages), and I am vying to find out whether or not it will be possible to publish it for the Nintendo NX. The physics for all main game play elements is largely complete and the core story is finished, the character needs designing but I know what to shoot for. There is already a game play manual and I'm sticking to it.
There is a possibility I may return to the states soon.
Who are you voting for in the election? I'm not. I just couldn't bring myself to support any candidate enough.Joshex (talk) 03:19, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
- o.0 so don't vote for the presidential race. Your vote effects congress, not to mention local officials such as mayors, council member, state congresses, governors, and whatnot. In some areas, even the court judges are on ballots. In many ways, voting for the local scene is much more important, as your vote actually counts for those, where as for the national many states are winner takes all, which means any vote for other ppl is wasted. --Sleepykitty (talk) 15:10, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
- @.@ oh, also, silly me, please don't ask who ppl voted for. This REALLY isn't the place for that kind of thing. --Sleepykitty (talk) 15:11, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
- True, but at this point I'd have to cast a absentee ballot, and it's too late to request one. I've pretty much decided no matter who is where, it's no longer a situation of what the government can or can't do that will save America, it's what people do that counts (economically and in a few other areas at least). And yeah, I only expressed my political position because it's rather neutral now-a-days, won't give any specifics of sides or supports. Joshex (talk) 15:22, 8 November 2016 (UTC)