|
|
| Line 6: |
Line 6: |
| | Go below this line! ~ {{:User:Aggelakis/Sig1}} 07:21, 17 September 2009 (UTC) | | Go below this line! ~ {{:User:Aggelakis/Sig1}} 07:21, 17 September 2009 (UTC) |
| | | | |
| − | ==Ex Libris==
| |
| | | | |
| − | In regards to the information that I added to Ex Libris' page. What hostile wording? I simply wrote the exact truth. Since when is that hostile? She started work for X company on X date and was fired by the CEO of said company on X date. How is that hostile? [[User:Peregrine Falcon|Peregrine Falcon]] 02:33, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | That is why I put "hostile" in single quotes. It's not hostile, it's 'hostile'. We don't care too much about the circumstances of former developers and community folk, especially whether they get fired. Just a comment that they worked there works sufficiently. ~ {{:User:Aggelakis/Sig1}} 04:22, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :Although english is my native language, I honestly don't understand the difference between "hostile" and 'hostile'. I don't believe that my wording was in any way hostile, I simply want to add factual information and retain the same writing style as the original paragraph. I offer this version as a compromise:
| |
| − |
| |
| − | On April 16th, 2009 Ex Libris announced that she would be ending her twenty-seven month stint with the 'City of' community and "moving on to conquer new online gaming horizons" while also re-introducing players to [[EMpulse]], who had returned to his old job. She started work at Sparkplay Media as their community manager for [[wikipedia:Earth Eternal|Earth Eternal]] on April 22nd, 2009 as [http://www.eartheternal.com/forums/Announcements/topics/Introducing-Earth-Eternals-New-Community-Manager Wyrd], and [http://www.eartheternal.com/forums/Help/topics/Things-that-you-should-know-about-EE left] on May 19th, 2009.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | : [[User:Peregrine Falcon|Peregrine Falcon]] 13:19, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :That's acceptable. "Was fired" is considered "charged language" in most people's vocabulary - not quite hostile, but 'hostile'. The wiki tries to avoid charged language. ~ {{:User:Aggelakis/Sig1}} 16:06, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==A quick thank you!==
| |
| − | I just felt the need to drop you a thank you for the creation of the Reward Merit template for the [[Flashback]] page! I'm new to the wiki so lacked the knowledge to template it myself! ~ [[User:Bunny|Bunny]] 17:06, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Quick request==
| |
| − | Would you mind an opinion on the [[Animation Customization]] article? There isn't really much of anything similar I can base it off of, so I've just been going with the best I can think of to flesh it out. Also, do you know how to, or do you know who else I could ask to, make animated .gifs for that page similar to how [[Emotes]]'s linked pages are (mostly) done? [[User:Draeth Darkstar|Draeth Darkstar]] 01:37, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Augustine Merits: Bug/Not Bug==
| |
| − | Regarding the release notes at http://tinyurl.com/ycjylsu, if I read that correctly, those changes have only been deployed to the test server, meaning that the bug is still present on the live servers. We should probably leave the bug note in the article until the fix goes live, shouldn't we? --[[User:Eabrace|Eabrace]] [[File:Healthbar notify phone.png|20px|link=User talk:Eabrace]] 21:53, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
| |
| − | :If you want to get technical, we should change the merit rewards to 24, and note that the bug that is making the rewards so low will be fixed in a future build, and that the merit award will then be 42. ~ {{:User:Aggelakis/Sig1}} 21:56, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
| |
| − | ::I would agree that sounds like the correct action. (I'd originally read the patch note backwards thinking that it was currently awarding 42 and should be awarding 24, but I think I've got it right now.) --[[User:Eabrace|Eabrace]] [[File:Healthbar notify phone.png|20px|link=User talk:Eabrace]] 23:28, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | | | |
| | == Re: Overview == | | == Re: Overview == |
Revision as of 19:53, 30 November 2009
Talk Page Replies
Please don't place replies to talk pages on my talk page. I keep an eye on the recent changes page for responses.
Talk Page Edits
Go below this line! ~ AGGE talk/cons 07:21, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Re: Overview
There are a buttload of pages on the wiki without a section titled "Overview", so I'm not really sure where this guideline comes from. After your post on my talk page, I did look around for (and eventually managed to find) the Article Guidelines page, but it wasn't an obvious find. And even then, it's a ginle sentence buried in a page of guidelines, with the only reference being a post from TonyV on the Paragon Forums.
I hit Random Page a few times just now, and of the pages that weren't disambiguation pages, or tiny things that aren't really articles (such as the individual Emote pages), I found about a 1:1 ratio of pages with and without == Overview ==.
I guess my point is twofold:
- The guidelines aren't obviously found, at least in my experience. Since joining, I've been working off of common sense and what I see throughout the rest of the wiki.
- I don't understand the need or reason for this specific guideline, particularly when half the articles I look at don't follow it.
FW (talk · contrib) 01:53, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
This conversation is continuing on FW's talk page. Please contain all replies to FW's talk page. ~ AGGE talk/cons
The Paragon Wiki Archive documents the state of City of Heroes/Villains as it existed on December 1, 2012.
