Difference between revisions of "Talk:Power Set Proliferation"
Bluebeetle27 (Talk | contribs) (→Future Possibilities) |
(→Revamp: new section) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Well, I wouldn't mind shortening it down. I could consolidate a lot of space by removing the input by some of the sets. If you really feel it should be done, I have no problem putting time in to do it. [[User:Bluebeetle27|Bluebeetle27]] 20:21, 17 July 2009 (UTC) | Well, I wouldn't mind shortening it down. I could consolidate a lot of space by removing the input by some of the sets. If you really feel it should be done, I have no problem putting time in to do it. [[User:Bluebeetle27|Bluebeetle27]] 20:21, 17 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Revamp == | ||
+ | |||
+ | At the moment, the article looks like one of the definition pages. Should this page be revamped with the instory background [[Dr. Brainstorm]] and his Resonance Manipulator device being the one responsible for powerset proliferation in a similiar manner to [[Mission Architect]] and [[Architect Entertainment]]? [[User:Sera404|Sera404]] 22:07, 17 July 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:07, 17 July 2009
Future Possibilities
Should these be here? Back on Issue 13's Talk page, we were told to remove speculation from that article, unless there was some type of souce. SaintNicster 19:25, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Well, I wouldn't mind shortening it down. I could consolidate a lot of space by removing the input by some of the sets. If you really feel it should be done, I have no problem putting time in to do it. Bluebeetle27 20:21, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Revamp
At the moment, the article looks like one of the definition pages. Should this page be revamped with the instory background Dr. Brainstorm and his Resonance Manipulator device being the one responsible for powerset proliferation in a similiar manner to Mission Architect and Architect Entertainment? Sera404 22:07, 17 July 2009 (UTC)