Difference between revisions of "Talk:Paragon City History"
From Paragon Wiki Archive
Sleepykitty (Talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:o.o the reason that they exist only here, is because the page on them has yet to be written. Think of it as a preemptive retaliation. ^^ you're always welcome to go in and start creating the pages that exist only as links right now. Between this page and the [[In-game timeline|time line]], there should be enough to at least get something started. --[[User:Sleepykitty|Sleepy Kitty]] 08:22, 10 August 2008 (UTC) | :o.o the reason that they exist only here, is because the page on them has yet to be written. Think of it as a preemptive retaliation. ^^ you're always welcome to go in and start creating the pages that exist only as links right now. Between this page and the [[In-game timeline|time line]], there should be enough to at least get something started. --[[User:Sleepykitty|Sleepy Kitty]] 08:22, 10 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::That's my point, though. If a character only exists as a name in the backstory, and nothing is known about them except what is mentioned in that backstory, do they deserve a page that contains nothing but a repeat of that information? I would have no problem creating a whole bunch of tiny articles about historical heroes, but it wouldn't add a single piece of content. It would just be a copy/paste of what's already written. It makes more sense to me to just remove the links, since the history and the time line already contain everything we know about them. [[User:SpaceNut|SpaceNut]] 08:49, 10 August 2008 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 08:49, 10 August 2008
This article has a ton of names linked, but the vast majority of those names exist only in the backstory written here, and any page that could be created would only be a rehash of the information presented here. Unless there are objections, I'm going to do a bunch of unlinking. SpaceNut 06:15, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
- o.o the reason that they exist only here, is because the page on them has yet to be written. Think of it as a preemptive retaliation. ^^ you're always welcome to go in and start creating the pages that exist only as links right now. Between this page and the time line, there should be enough to at least get something started. --Sleepy Kitty 08:22, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
- That's my point, though. If a character only exists as a name in the backstory, and nothing is known about them except what is mentioned in that backstory, do they deserve a page that contains nothing but a repeat of that information? I would have no problem creating a whole bunch of tiny articles about historical heroes, but it wouldn't add a single piece of content. It would just be a copy/paste of what's already written. It makes more sense to me to just remove the links, since the history and the time line already contain everything we know about them. SpaceNut 08:49, 10 August 2008 (UTC)