 The Paragon Wiki Archive documents the state of City of Heroes/Villains as it existed on December 1, 2012.
|
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Base Item Origins"
From Paragon Wiki Archive
Felderburg (Talk | contribs) (I have another question!!! About categories for bases.) |
(→Category?) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
So this article has the Base Items category - should it also be placed in the general Bases category? It looks like there are a lot of articles about bases that are part of a base subcategory, so I guess that counts, right? It would maybe be silly to put something (in this case) in the Base Items sub category and then also the main Bases category, right? The only issue with this is that in looking at various articles, there's no direct link from base-related stuff to the main article about [[Supergroup Bases]]. Shouldn't there be? [[User:Felderburg|Felderburg]] 21:07, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | So this article has the Base Items category - should it also be placed in the general Bases category? It looks like there are a lot of articles about bases that are part of a base subcategory, so I guess that counts, right? It would maybe be silly to put something (in this case) in the Base Items sub category and then also the main Bases category, right? The only issue with this is that in looking at various articles, there's no direct link from base-related stuff to the main article about [[Supergroup Bases]]. Shouldn't there be? [[User:Felderburg|Felderburg]] 21:07, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :The navbox had a link to [[Supergroup]] [[Supergroup Base|Bases]] in the title field. I changed the title to simply link to [[Supergroup Base]]s and added [[Supergroup]] to the 'general' field. ~ {{User:Aggelakis/Sig1}} 03:44, 29 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:44, 29 June 2013
Category?
So this article has the Base Items category - should it also be placed in the general Bases category? It looks like there are a lot of articles about bases that are part of a base subcategory, so I guess that counts, right? It would maybe be silly to put something (in this case) in the Base Items sub category and then also the main Bases category, right? The only issue with this is that in looking at various articles, there's no direct link from base-related stuff to the main article about Supergroup Bases. Shouldn't there be? Felderburg 21:07, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
- The navbox had a link to Supergroup Bases in the title field. I changed the title to simply link to Supergroup Bases and added Supergroup to the 'general' field. ~ AGGE talk/cons 03:44, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
