Difference between revisions of "Help talk:Contents"
Sleepykitty (Talk | contribs) (→Forum Ban appeal page) |
(→Forum Ban appeal page) |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
:: there are different levels of banning and types. While site-wide banning is possible, usually if someone acts up on the forums (which are Titan Network's, not just the wiki's) they don't also vandalize. Discussions can get heated and things said, but that doesn't make someone who got banned there a bad person, so we try to use the least needed punishment first, rather than a blanket one. Don't worry, the wiki can be reverted, and things can be reverted wholesale based on user for when we do have a vandal. Not only that, but things are backed up regularly. --[[User:Sleepykitty|Sleepykitty]] ([[User talk:Sleepykitty|talk]]) 08:38, 16 September 2016 (UTC) | :: there are different levels of banning and types. While site-wide banning is possible, usually if someone acts up on the forums (which are Titan Network's, not just the wiki's) they don't also vandalize. Discussions can get heated and things said, but that doesn't make someone who got banned there a bad person, so we try to use the least needed punishment first, rather than a blanket one. Don't worry, the wiki can be reverted, and things can be reverted wholesale based on user for when we do have a vandal. Not only that, but things are backed up regularly. --[[User:Sleepykitty|Sleepykitty]] ([[User talk:Sleepykitty|talk]]) 08:38, 16 September 2016 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Any chance of getting read only-access? so I can at least read my PMs. [[User:Joshex|Joshex]] ([[User talk:Joshex|talk]]) 03:06, 19 October 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:06, 19 October 2016
Ugh, the seedy underside of having a publically editable wiki is that you run the risk of idiots vandalizing it with ads and such.
Thanks for the rollback, Arkanor, and good eye on catching it.
No problem. This site is vastly too useful to let folks mess it up. - Arkenor
Unlock?
IMO, You have enough editors to warrant unlocking almost every page. Those users can handle fixing up any vandalized pages. :)
The possible exception is the front page. But I've also heard some good arguments for opening that page, too.
Thanks!
∙ Stip Talk ∙ Contribs 12:58, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
Help with Search
The Search page mentions going to the Help page for help with Searching but there is no help on the Help:Contents page. ---Torin23 01:57, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Forum Ban appeal page
I noticed there is no place on cohtitan and it's related sites for ban appeals. Could it be possible to make such a page somewhere? I am currently perma-banned from the forum by Aggelakis, so I had to resort to coming here to the discussion tab on a help page and hope someone sees it. Thanks when you do.
---joshex 23:38, 08 August 2016 (CST)
- Appeals of that nature can be directed to the Titan admin staff via email: admins@cohtitan.com. -- Sekoia (talk) 03:51, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- Just noticed this (I'm a little late, I know). Seems to me that there should be an easier way on the forums to be notified of that method of contact. Not only for ease of appeal (or contacting generally) but also because I suspect we don't want banned people editing the wiki either, right? In this case it was benign but if someone with actual ill intent towards the forums gets banned, seems to me they may take that ill intent to the wiki. So I would suggest considering making a ban in any single Titan site to apply to all Titan sites. Felderburg (talk) 04:57, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- there are different levels of banning and types. While site-wide banning is possible, usually if someone acts up on the forums (which are Titan Network's, not just the wiki's) they don't also vandalize. Discussions can get heated and things said, but that doesn't make someone who got banned there a bad person, so we try to use the least needed punishment first, rather than a blanket one. Don't worry, the wiki can be reverted, and things can be reverted wholesale based on user for when we do have a vandal. Not only that, but things are backed up regularly. --Sleepykitty (talk) 08:38, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Any chance of getting read only-access? so I can at least read my PMs. Joshex (talk) 03:06, 19 October 2016 (UTC)