Badge time.png   The Paragon Wiki Archive documents the state of City of Heroes/Villains as it existed on December 1, 2012.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ghosts"

From Paragon Wiki Archive
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Ghost Factions)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
::Technically, those are [[Spectral Pirates]].  It probably wouldn't hurt to put a "See Also" in the page about ghosts, though. --[[User:TonyV|TonyV]] 19:23, 6 Feb 2006 (CST)
 
::Technically, those are [[Spectral Pirates]].  It probably wouldn't hurt to put a "See Also" in the page about ghosts, though. --[[User:TonyV|TonyV]] 19:23, 6 Feb 2006 (CST)
 +
 +
== Link to mission? ==
 +
 +
I'm running some Gordon Bower missions atm, so when I came across a named ghost, I thought to link to the mission she was in, since it was documented.
 +
 +
So, would this be a good idea?  The con I see is that if the title for the linked mission gets changed, it wouldn't link directly to the mission anymore, causing a link that takes you to the right page, but not the correct info.
 +
 +
--[[User:StarGeek|StarGeek]] 17:54, 7 Feb 2006 (CST)

Revision as of 23:54, 7 February 2006

Ghost Factions

Since there are two different types of Ghosts factions (Ghost ship ghosts, and the Croatoa ghosts) and they count toward two seperate badges, should there be two categories, i.e. Ghosts (Croatoa) and Ghosts (Ghost Ship) or should they stay combined? --StarGeek 17:26, 6 Feb 2006 (CST)

I guess there are ghosts in CoV, also. Further complications :D --StarGeek 18:46, 6 Feb 2006 (CST)
Technically, those are Spectral Pirates. It probably wouldn't hurt to put a "See Also" in the page about ghosts, though. --TonyV 19:23, 6 Feb 2006 (CST)

Link to mission?

I'm running some Gordon Bower missions atm, so when I came across a named ghost, I thought to link to the mission she was in, since it was documented.

So, would this be a good idea? The con I see is that if the title for the linked mission gets changed, it wouldn't link directly to the mission anymore, causing a link that takes you to the right page, but not the correct info.

--StarGeek 17:54, 7 Feb 2006 (CST)