Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Navbox Alignment"
Torch Light (Talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:Vigilante and Rogue '''are''' steps in the alignment change process. A hero can become a villain by first becoming a vigilante. A villain can become a hero by first becoming a rogue. ~ {{:User:Aggelakis/Sig1}} 06:19, 12 May 2010 (UTC) | :Vigilante and Rogue '''are''' steps in the alignment change process. A hero can become a villain by first becoming a vigilante. A villain can become a hero by first becoming a rogue. ~ {{:User:Aggelakis/Sig1}} 06:19, 12 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
:You can stop anywhere along the chain, and you can reverse at any time and go "back". It's still a chain. ~ {{:User:Aggelakis/Sig1}} 06:21, 12 May 2010 (UTC) | :You can stop anywhere along the chain, and you can reverse at any time and go "back". It's still a chain. ~ {{:User:Aggelakis/Sig1}} 06:21, 12 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | The keynote presentation shows that this is not the case. The villain version of a hero IS a vigilante, it's not one step. If this has been elaborated on further since then, I have not seen, but if you have a source please bring it up and we'll keep it that way. I posted a link to the video detailing this on the main wiki page. --[[User:Dekar|Dekar]] 17:04, 13 May 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:04, 13 May 2010
Hey there, I know I'm new but I was seeing a few errors in the alignment listings. Vigilante and Rogue are not steps in a chain from hero to villain, the team stated that heroes can become vigilantes, and villains can become rogues, so I made a few changes to the listings. Please let me know if I fumbled on formatting, I don't really do much wiki stuff, heh. Thank you!
Dekar 05:51, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- Vigilante and Rogue are steps in the alignment change process. A hero can become a villain by first becoming a vigilante. A villain can become a hero by first becoming a rogue. ~ AGGE talk/cons 06:19, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- You can stop anywhere along the chain, and you can reverse at any time and go "back". It's still a chain. ~ AGGE talk/cons 06:21, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
The keynote presentation shows that this is not the case. The villain version of a hero IS a vigilante, it's not one step. If this has been elaborated on further since then, I have not seen, but if you have a source please bring it up and we'll keep it that way. I posted a link to the video detailing this on the main wiki page. --Dekar 17:04, 13 May 2010 (UTC)