Badge time.png   The Paragon Wiki Archive documents the state of City of Heroes/Villains as it existed on December 1, 2012.

Difference between revisions of "User talk:Iakona"

From Paragon Wiki Archive
Jump to: navigation, search
(cleaning page as conversations were 3+ years old and now irrelevant)
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Banned ==
 
I'm halting all my Issue 9-related updates indefinitely; at least until NCsoft tells me why I've been banned from the forums.  I suspect it is because of my recent post on the official boards about Hamidon in Issue 9.--[[User:Iakona|Iakona]] 13:05, 9 March 2007 (PST)
 
  
:  Sorry to hear that.  I've definitely appreciated you filling us in on various things.  Hopefully, they will explain why, and allow you back in soon enough. - [[User:Snorii|Snorii]] 13:55, 9 March 2007 (PST)
 
 
:: o.o I'm assuming that the post about Hami was also removed? I don't see one that sticks out about him in your post history.. (<-- is curious about what was said) --[[User:Sleepykitty|Sleepy Kitty]] 13:59, 9 March 2007 (PST)
 
 
:::There's a copy of my post on the Infinity forums in a thread called [http://boards.cityofheroes.com/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=7804299 HUGE SPOILER WARNING HAMIDON]--[[User:Iakona|Iakona]] 14:19, 9 March 2007 (PST)
 
 
:::: o.o;; thats what you think they banned you over? thats almost nothing..
 
 
My guess is, if that was it, then it was sorta a "last straw" kind of thing.  They got tired of having that level of information leaked, and decided enough was enough.  So not that one post in particular, but a built up reaction to all the I9 info leaks posts.  Just my guess as to the situation. - [[User:Sister Leortha|Sister Leortha]] 15:41, 9 March 2007 (PST)
 
: If that were the case, I would think I should have heard at least ''something'' prior to the ban, telling me to stop posting Issue 9 info.  Plus the other posts should've been removed as well, not just the Hami one.--[[User:Iakona|Iakona]] 15:57, 9 March 2007 (PST)
 
 
Kinda sucks Iakona. Keep us update with your level of detail whenever you can.[[User:Catwhoorg|Catwhoorg]] 15:50, 9 March 2007 (PST)
 
 
 
o.o [http://boards.cityofheroes.com/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=Issue9&Number=7810838&bodyprev=#Post7810838 from lighthouse]: "It is only a temp ban. Please pass on to Iakona to feel free to write me at Lighthouse@ncsoft.com as it appears he hasn't received my communication regarding the issue.
 
 
We sincerely appreciate everyone who's helping with the testing of Issue 9 and keeping it confidential. Everyone will have the chance to check it out when we put it up on the Training Room for open beta."
 
 
>_> while I doubt he apologies or really gives a reason, it might at least give a hint why you where singled out. --[[User:Sleepykitty|Sleepy Kitty]] 22:56, 9 March 2007 (PST)
 
: Going on 12 hours since the ban now, and still not a word from anyone officially related to CoX.  I emailed web@ncaustin.com and Lighthouse@ncsoft.com several hours ago, and have received no response.  I know for a fact that my email address registered with NCsoft is correct, as I was still getting "Reply to a favorite topic:" emails even after I was banned.  So either 1) Lighthouse doesn't know how to use email; 2) Lighthouse and NCsoft are ignoring me; or 3) Something is borked between NCsoft and Yahoo email.--[[User:Iakona|Iakona]] 23:09, 9 March 2007 (PST)
 
 
: o.o well.. I'd hope he knows how to use it.. maybe try [[Ex Libris]]? I believe her's is Ex Libris@ncsoft.com.. the space might be a _ or not there though.. o,o on a side note, if you look at where the thread that your info had been copied to, Lighthouse has nuked it and confirmed that you where either right, or very close to it.. >.> so you might want to update the [[Hamidon Raiding]] section. I know I would, just start a section marked i9 and we can later move everything down into a Legacy raiding section when it hits, or maybe move the new stuff into a [[Hamidon Task Force]] page. --[[User:Sleepykitty|Sleepy Kitty]] 23:19, 9 March 2007 (PST)
 

Latest revision as of 21:45, 31 March 2010