Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Villain Accolade Multibadge NavBox"
From Paragon Wiki Archive
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Since they're all listed on How to Get already, with better breakdown of what exactly needs done, I think this is redundant and unnecessary. -- [[User:Aggelakis|Agge]] ([[User_talk:Aggelakis|talk]]) 17:50, 9 December 2008 (UTC) | :Since they're all listed on How to Get already, with better breakdown of what exactly needs done, I think this is redundant and unnecessary. -- [[User:Aggelakis|Agge]] ([[User_talk:Aggelakis|talk]]) 17:50, 9 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | : I would put them on the contributing badges, but not on the accolades. Also, I would remove the badge icons from the NavBox. They don't really belong there. Navboxes are more for navigation, not so much for information or illustration. The more non-navigation that gets added, the less useful they are. -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 06:55, 10 December 2008 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 06:55, 10 December 2008
Is this an appropriate use of Template:navbox? Or is it redundant to the badge requirements on the individual pages? Born in Battle Badge · Demonic Badge --Konoko 16:29, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- Since they're all listed on How to Get already, with better breakdown of what exactly needs done, I think this is redundant and unnecessary. -- Agge (talk) 17:50, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- I would put them on the contributing badges, but not on the accolades. Also, I would remove the badge icons from the NavBox. They don't really belong there. Navboxes are more for navigation, not so much for information or illustration. The more non-navigation that gets added, the less useful they are. -- Sekoia 06:55, 10 December 2008 (UTC)